Statement before Glenn A. Walsh
Council:
Local Funding for Telephone: 412-561-7876
Public Transit Service Electronic Mail: < gawalsh@planetarium.cc >
In
2007
October 2
Good
evening. I am Glenn A. Walsh of
I support County Executive
Dan Onorato’s proposal to move local
funding for public transit away from the property tax, as public transit
needs a local funding vehicle that grows with the needs of public transit
service. At this point in time, the Pennsylvania General Assembly has approved
only two alternatives: a “poured-drink” tax and a rental-car tax. I do support
passage of Council bills 3375-07 and 3379-07 which would enact such levies.
Without the passage of these
new levies, I am quite concerned regarding the future of public transit service
in
Although I live relatively close to the Light
Rail Transit line, which likely will continue operating regardless of any
further major cuts, there are thousands of County residents who are not so
fortunate. Many county residents have already been inconvenienced by the first
round of transit cuts. Any further cuts
could be a severe hardship on many more county residents and very possibly
isolate neighborhoods.
Now, I understand that you
expect PAT to reduce the cost and increase the efficiency of local transit
service, and rightly so. PAT management has taken several steps, over the last
few months, to implement such changes. And, I would agree that further
efficiencies are necessary. However, without
adversely affecting transit service and, hence, severely impacting many county
residents, further efficiencies may not be possible until July, following
implementation of a new labor agreement.
I urge you not to completely withhold additional local
transit funding until additional transit service efficiencies can be
implemented. If you believe that you can not enact these two bills, in
their present form at this time, then I ask that you provide PAT with stop-gap funding, to ensure more drastic service cuts are
not necessary before July.
If, after consultation with
PAT officials, it is determined a temporary tax is necessary to maintain
present transit service levels until July, then I suggest that you enact a temporary tax that sunsets in July.
Then, in July, you can reevaluate the
need for the proposed transit levies, based on the additional transit service efficiencies
implemented in the new labor agreement.
I ask that you be sensitive to the needs of the many
residents of
Thank you.
gaw