Official Public Comment: TDP
Tuesday, September 29, 2009 7:33 PM
From: "Glenn A. Walsh" <email@example.com>
To: "Dave Wohlwill" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
c: "Glenn A. Walsh" <email@example.com>
To: David Wohlwill
From: Glenn A. Walsh
This afternoon I attempted, and I think I succeeded, in posting my public comments to the TDP web site. But, I cannot be sure!
This is why I prefer sending comments in by e-mail rather than posting to a web site. With e-mail I have a record of what was sent and what time it was sent, hence proof that it was sent before a deadline. I have none of this posting to a web site. On the web site, the only acknowledgement I received was:
Thank you for your feedback.
Your comments have been submitted.
I have to record the time myself, which I recorded as:
2009 September 29 2:37 p.m. EDST
David, the problem is that during my posting, an error message came up indicating that my message had exceeded the 4,000 character limit.
LIMIT--WHAT LIMIT? I thought there was no limit for written public comments. And, how could there possibly be a limit for such a huge service change proposal. This proposal is GAZILLION times greater than the 4,000 character limit. It should be expected that there be would large public responses to such an all-encompassing proposal of change!
The problem is, I now cannot be sure that my entire message was received by the TDP system. I fear that my message was cut-off at 4,000 characters, and the rest of the message was lost.
Hence, I am now sending the entire message to you by e-mail, to ensure you receive the entire message before the deadline:
The following are my official public comments on the final recommendations for the Transit Development Plan of the Port Authority of Allegheny County:
1) I STRENUOUSLY oppose the renumbering system they propose for bus routes. This is a throw-back to the old Pittsburgh Railways numbering system. The new numbering system implemented by PAT in 1964 is one thing PAT got right. It numbers buses by corridor and often by main arterial into the city; specific bus routes that branch off of the arterial get a letter. So, you know one bus number for whatever part of town you want to go to.
For instance, when you are Downtown and some asks how to get to
This renumbering proposal comes under the file, "If it ain't broke don't fix it!" The current system works well. The only problem is that there are some inconsistencies in the present system.
Probably the most glaring inconsistency is the 36A
AND, both the Allegheny County Transit Council and I have pointed this out to the PAT Service Development Staff. They ignored our advice to make the 36A consistent with the rest of the system.
There are a few other inconsistencies with the present system that could easily be ironed-out. Iron-out these inconsistencies to make a very consistent system that works as it was designed to work in 1964!
2) If a color-code system is used for rail lines (as
3) If colors are used for the Busways and the HOV Lane, which I do NOT support (colors should be reserved for rail lines, as in all other transit systems), then the bus line designation prefix should be "EB" for East Busway, "WB" for West Busway, or "NH" for North Hills HOV Lane--NOT the letter prefixes for each color as presently proposed; this proposal is just nonsensical.
4) I oppose folding Fare Zone 3 into Zone 2--there should be a discount for people who actually live in
Actually, the Port Authority Administration really wants to eventually eliminate all zones and have one flat zone, which I STRENUOUSLY oppose. A flat fare zone means that suburbanites that travel by bus ten miles pay the same rate as a city dweller only going a few blocks! This is completely unfair with city dwellers subsidizing suburbanites.
At one time PAT had a 13-zone fare system. I agree, this was too cumbersome. However, a 3-zone fare system, with Zone 3 for all areas outside of
5) Reducing Rail and Bus Stops – The primary concern here is to ensure speedier rail and bus service *during rush hours*. Yet, due to the demographics of our region, additional rail and bus stops are needed for the transit-dependent, particularly senior citizens.
Hence, rail and bus stops should only be reduced during rush hours. This can easily be done by using two specific types of bus stop signs:
a) Red Sign—Clearly stating that this stop is served at all times.
b) Blue Sign—Clearly stating that this stop is not served during rush hours.
6) I support maintaining the two-dollar base fare.
7) The Overbrook Junction--Willow Avenue Rail Station Complex was poorly designed for the type of transfers that will occur with the Red Line ending at Overbrook Junction instead of
Glenn A. Walsh
P.O. Box 1041
Pittsburgh PA 15230-1041 U.S.A.
Glenn A. Walsh, Project Director,
Friends of the Zeiss < http://friendsofthezeiss.org >
Electronic Mail - < firstname.lastname@example.org >
SPACE & SCIENCE NEWS, ASTRONOMICAL CALENDAR:
< http://buhlplanetarium.tripod.com/#news >
Author of History Web Sites on the Internet --
* Buhl Planetarium, Pittsburgh:
< http://buhlplanetarium.tripod.com >
* Adler Planetarium, Chicago:
< http://adlerplanetarium.tripod.com >
* Astronomer, Educator, Optician John A. Brashear:
< http://johnbrashear.tripod.com >
* Andrew Carnegie & Carnegie Libraries:
< http://andrewcarnegie.tripod.com >
* Duquesne Incline cable-car railway, Pittsburgh:
< http://incline.pghfree.net >
* Public Transit:
< http://andrewcarnegie2.tripod.com/transit >